In Focus Resource Center > Insights

Impact of Leases on Stadiums and Arenas

Over the last decade or so, the sports industry has seen professional organizations elect to renovate or construct new sporting facilities costing hundreds of millions, even billions of dollars. This is done in an effort to provide a better draw for more talented players and provide fans with an improved game day experience. More often than not, these stadiums/arenas along with the land they are attached to, are not owned by the ownership of the sports organizations but by local governments, private interest groups, or other third parties. This often leaves the organizations to enter into long term leases to cover the related debt facility terms.

Upcoming Stadium and Arenas either under construction or completed:


  • Las Vegas Stadium (Las Vegas Raiders) 2021
  • Los Angeles Stadium and Entertainment District (LA Rams) 2020
  • Allianz Field (Minnesota United FC) 2019
  • Globe Life Field (Texas Rangers) 2020
  • Austin FC Stadium (Austin FC) 2021


  • Ford Field (Detroit Lions)
  • Quick Loans Arena (Cleveland Cavs)

As the accounting for leases with the FASB issuance of Topic 842 are set to change December 15, 2019 for public entities and December 15, 2020 for privately-held entities, ownership and management should begin to educate themselves on the potential impact the standard will have on the recognition, timing and uncertainty of cash flows, which may arise from their lease obligations. Although not yet formally approved, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has voted to delay adoption of the standard for privately-held companies to January 2021, given the magnitude of the wide-sweeping changes.

Some key changes include:

  1. The elimination of the bright-line lease classification criteria that teams were able to use to avoid the capitalization of the leases
  2. Lessees will report a lease obligation and a corresponding right-of-use asset for both operating and finance leases, measured at present value of the payments, thus moving the lease from off-balance sheet to on the balance sheet.
  3. For any teams in the middle of their leases they would have to calculate a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption.

This change in the standard will force ownership and its creditors to re-evaluate third party debt covenants and any other compliance requirements to ensure the organizations do not fall into default with their obligations. Management may also have to determine any potential book to tax differences that may arise from these changes.

This article first appeared on Front Office Sports, where Citrin Cooperman is pleased to have a year-long foundational sponsorship. 

Our specialists are here to help.

Get in touch with a specialist in your industry today. 

* Required

* I understand and agree to Citrin Cooperman’s Privacy Notice, which governs how Citrin Cooperman collects, uses, and shares my personal information. This includes my right to unsubscribe from marketing emails and further manage my Privacy Choices at any time. If you are a California Resident, please refer to our California Notice at Collection. If you have questions regarding our use of your personal data/information, please send an e-mail to