Insights
Hindsight is 20/20: JM Assets and the Blow to Tax Certainty
Published on July 17, 2025
5 minute read
As seen in Procedurally Taxing - Tax Notes Federal
In this article, the first of a two-part series, Managing Director Jenni Black examines the Tax Court opinion in JM Assets, and she argues that by determining reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2)(i) is “invalid,” the court opinion removes quite a bit of certainty for both taxpayers and the government.
Explore the second article of the series as Jenni continues her examination of JM Assets LP, questions whether the Tax Court actually held reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2) was invalid and discusses the impact the opinion has on tax certainty.
Latest Articles
Insights
Published August 21, 2026
What Separates High-Performing Internal Audit Functions from the Rest
Read More
Insights
Published August 17, 2026
The Invisible Risk on Your Risk Register: When Critical Knowledge Lives in People
Read More
Insights
Published August 12, 2026
BBA: Can an FPA Be Issued When the Modification Period Is Open?
Read More
Insights
Published August 10, 2026
Trade Fraud Enforcement Is Transforming from Policy Initiative to Institutionalized Program
Read More


