Insights
Hindsight is 20/20: JM Assets and the Blow to Tax Certainty
Published on July 17, 2025
5 minute read
As seen in Procedurally Taxing - Tax Notes Federal
In this article, the first of a two-part series, Managing Director Jenni Black examines the Tax Court opinion in JM Assets, and she argues that by determining reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2)(i) is “invalid,” the court opinion removes quite a bit of certainty for both taxpayers and the government.
Explore the second article of the series as Jenni continues her examination of JM Assets LP, questions whether the Tax Court actually held reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2) was invalid and discusses the impact the opinion has on tax certainty.
Latest Articles
Insights
Published October 01, 2026
FASB's ASU 2026-03 Closes a Fair Value Gap for Restricted Securities Held by Investment Companies
Read More
Insights
Published October 01, 2026
Spotlight on Advisory Services: Outsourcing Solutions
Read More
Insights
Published September 30, 2026
Financial Due Diligence in Personal Injury Law Firm Transactions
Read More
Insights
Published September 25, 2026
Comparing Apples to Apples: TEFRA vs. BBA
Read More


