Insights
Hindsight is 20/20: JM Assets and the Blow to Tax Certainty
Published on July 17, 2025
5 minute read
As seen in Procedurally Taxing - Tax Notes Federal
In this article, the first of a two-part series, Managing Director Jenni Black examines the Tax Court opinion in JM Assets, and she argues that by determining reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2)(i) is “invalid,” the court opinion removes quite a bit of certainty for both taxpayers and the government.
Explore the second article of the series as Jenni continues her examination of JM Assets LP, questions whether the Tax Court actually held reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2) was invalid and discusses the impact the opinion has on tax certainty.
Latest Articles
Insights
Published July 10, 2026
Inventory: A Strategic Opportunity for Manufacturers and Distributors
Read More
Insights
Published July 09, 2026
Did I Do That? Jones Bluff and Due Process Under BBA
Read More
Insights
Published July 08, 2026
How AI Is Reshaping the Billing Model for Law Firms
Read More
Insights
Published July 06, 2026
Why Relationships, Not Price, Will Define Growth in Manufacturing
Read More


