Insights
Hindsight is 20/20: JM Assets and the Blow to Tax Certainty
Published on July 17, 2025
5 minute read
As seen in Procedurally Taxing - Tax Notes Federal
In this article, the first of a two-part series, Managing Director Jenni Black examines the Tax Court opinion in JM Assets, and she argues that by determining reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2)(i) is “invalid,” the court opinion removes quite a bit of certainty for both taxpayers and the government.
Explore the second article of the series as Jenni continues her examination of JM Assets LP, questions whether the Tax Court actually held reg. section 301.6235-1(b)(2) was invalid and discusses the impact the opinion has on tax certainty.
Latest Articles
Insights
Published May 12, 2026
Partnership-Related Items: Staying Relevant
Read More
Insights
Published May 12, 2026
CPQ vs Revenue Cloud: Knowing When to Move Beyond Standard Quoting
Read More
Insights
Published May 11, 2026
Isn't It Ironic? A Court's Ability to Make Adjustments Under BBA
Read More
Insights
Published May 11, 2026
"No Tax on Tips" Regulations Are Now Final: What Restaurant Employers Need to Focus On
Read More


